07.19.2023 19:00 UTC

There's a separation of spaces across social media, mainly seeking to see which will "finally" satisfy the majority of the public, and in it, "hopefully" (lottery aspects matter also) satisfy the consumers of the latest social media space.

Is it important?

Yes, and no.

No, it doesn't matter if it's called this or that, or if the speech is framed as this or that, or other aspects.

What matters is what is the truth from the start, and with that, it is a product someone seeks to profit from, not matter what.

Is it wrong? Not necessarily, and it is depending on so many aspects which were and have always and continue to be, ignored.

Is that the point? If it isn't, why not see them and address them fairly?

People still want to gather online on social media, but who is the person people behind all together matters also, along all other aspects.

Laws that protect consumers and overall safety as well.

So you understand the impact of, children are inevitably in digital data from the second the pregnant person announces or tests for pregnancy signs in this modern era, even if the parent isn't online at all, because digital data is digital data.

That means it virtually affects everyone, including those exploding it, while they are blinded by the temporary gain, in greedy pursuits.

The more their family and those involved are online, adds to it. Is it safe, or is there a difference from online on say private social locked accounts, public social accounts, or even days like doctors' and and other?

When data is being treated like modern day slave trade by those collecting it and piecing it apart to sell it, and it is surpassing the value even of most used/ depended on real life application resources, it is of course a situation that goes to say the gain of it financially has to be significant to be prioritized the way it becomes, and the source of the resource is people, whom are unaware, and non compensated, nor protected, who are also in non legal markets, and legal spaces are open to significant corruption to protect such operations. The cost that greed does no see though is collapse.

As someone that has been literally made the symbol of these things, by these people behind it, as mock and literally experienced top of the chain abuse in this sense, needless to say why the lack of support found through traditional posting to social, and why also the lack of acknowledgement, and so on.

So, what does matter? A lot of things that acknowledge the wrong, and takes from the wrong hands, while retributes to those harmed by it, and creates a system that is fair.

Does my case relate directly with all aspects of social? No, but the safety of data collection, and acknowledgement of the source of all of it absolutely matters, or it is only harm favored; slavery of the modern day.

The greedy mind is absolutely never ever satisfied; while some people like to seek to advance, there's a fine line to cross between being a successful individual, on the road to advancing themselves and or business (impossible to be of value without working on ourselves, particularly in a corrupt society), and greedily taking and seeking advantage while making claims, creating narratives, curating images.

The society we are in, the laws passed, and so on, are by people with interest in a financial gain that do not know refuse to open the space to people who are able to do more, and do not comprehend the compounded impact of their ignorance in time, where they are also ironically affected by their less than thoughtful decisions.

The adding of value, as I've written many times, is well past a number of currency someone or a a group gain; there are many costs which accrue, regardless of being a knowledged or not.

The point being talked about is about financial wealth long term, not referring to the emotional or sentimental, which also matter on a collective significantly, they also happen to be some of the top reasons data is traded, besides the take from talent, and the targeting and profiling, and so on.

Business and other aspects of profit to small or start ups are things offered at premium prices on all these spaces, for example.

Which in exchange are a good profitable business to the owners/ investors, and an opportunity if ran fairly, which often unfortunately has not as it has been proven of tense scenarios over the years of its appearance and growth.

As much as it offers, it can only be done on a fair trade of benefit for it to be truly of value to individuals and to society across time, otherwise it is simply a space to gain profit of, until the unaware become dissatisfied, the harm increases, and something breaks the process enough to make it noteworthy of seeing, no safety, no law, no law abidance, no proper restructure, leads to no good place, no advancement.

007.19.2023 19:33 UTC

&nbsp;

&nbsp;